CHAPTER XIX
THE GROTESQUE IN CARVING
Misproportion not Essential to the Expression of Humor - The Sham Grotesque
Contemptible - A True Sense of Humor Helpful to the Carver.
The dullness which comes of "all work and no play" may be said to affect the [wood]carver at times. He tires of carving leaves and ornaments: what more natural
than to seek change and amusement in the invention of droll figures of men or animals? The enjoyment which we all feel in contemplating the outcome of this
spirit in ancient work, leads us to the imitation of both subject and manner, hoping thereby that the same results may be obtained; but somehow the
repetition is seldom attended with much success, while of original fancies of the same sort we are obliged to confess ourselves almost destitute. Who can
behold the fantastic humors of Gothic carvings without being both amused and interested? Those grotesque heads with gaping mouths recall [181]
the stories of childhood, peopled with goblins and gnomes. It is all so natural, and so much in keeping with the architecture which surrounds it, the
carving is so rude and simple, that it seems absurd when some authority on such matters makes a statement to the effect that all such expression of humor has
become forever impossible to ourselves.
This important part of the question must be left to your own meditation, to
settle according to your lights; experience will probably lead you ultimately
to the same opinion. Meantime, the point I wish to impress upon you is this,
that until you feel yourself secure, and something of a master of various
branches of your craft, you should not attempt any subject which aims at being
decidedly grotesque. There are very good and practical reasons for this; one is,
that while you are studying your art, you must do nothing that may tend to
obscure what faculties you have for judging proportion.
Now, as all grotesque work is based more or less on exaggeration, it forms a very dangerous kind of
exercise to the beginner, therefore I should never allow a pupil of mine to so
much as attempt it. Do not think [182] that I wish
to discourage every effort which has not an ultra-serious aim. On the contrary,
I am but taking a rather roundabout way to an admission that the humorous
element has, and must have at all times, a powerful attraction for the wood-carver; and to the statement of an opinion that it should not be allowed
to take a prominent place in the work of a student; moreover, that it is quite
possible to find in nature a varied and unfailing source of suggestion in this
respect (more, in fact, than we are ever likely to account for), and which
requires no artificial exaggeration to aid its expression. Some tincture of the
faculty is absolutely necessary to the carver who takes his subjects from birds
or beasts, in order that he may perceive and seize the salient lines and
characteristic forms, of which the key-note is often to be found in a faint
touch of humor, and which, like the scent of a flower, adds charm by appealing to another sense.
The same argument applies to the treatment of the human figure. Let no
student (and I may include, also, master-carver) think that a grotesque
treatment will raise the smile or excite the interest [183] which is anticipated. The "grotesque" is a vehicle
for grim and often terrible ideas, lightly veiled by a cloak of humorous
exaggeration; a sort of Viking horse-play—it is, in fact, a language which
expresses the mixed feelings of sportive contempt and real fear in about equal
proportions. When these feelings are not behind the expression, it becomes a
language which is in itself only contemptible.
Fig. 63.
[185] If,
carried away by fancy, you must find vent for its impulses, and carve images of
unearthly beings, at least make them cheerful looking; one can imagine such
demons and goblins as being rather nice fellows than otherwise. A grim jest
that fails is generally a foolish one—at least its perpetrator neither deserves
nor receives sympathy for his discomfiture. Now, I shall show you one or two
examples which may make this matter a little clearer to you, if you are at all
inclined to argue the position. I think, at any rate, they will prove that the
expression of humor does not always depend upon exaggeration, and may exist in a
work which is, one may say, almost copied from nature. Fig. 63 is an example to
[186] this
effect. The little jester just emerging from a flower, one of the side-pieces to
a Miserere seat carving, is undoubtedly a true portrait, carved without the
slightest attempt at exaggeration. The quiet humor which it evinces required
only sympathy to perceive and skill to portray on the part of its carver. He had
nothing to invent in the common acceptation of the word. The carving of the
mendicant, which comes on the other side, is equally vivid in its truth to
nature. It is so lifelike that we do not notice the humorous enjoyment of the
artist in depicting the whining lips and closed eyes of the professional beggar.
Observe the good manners of it all—the natural refinement of the artist who
leaves his characters to make all the fun, without intrusion from himself other
than to give the aid of his skill in representation. Now, subjects of this class
will, in all probability, present themselves until the end of the world; but
artists like this Gothic one are not so likely to be common. Great technical
skill, a large fund of vitality, and many other controlling qualities are
necessary to the production of such an artist; but he gives a clue to the right
action, which [187] we may with safety accept, even if we can not
hope to equal his performance.
Fig. 64.
Fig. 65.
The center-piece, Fig. 64, tells a little story of Samson. It is noticeable
in these medieval picture subjects, how, when a story has to be told, the
details are treated in a broad and distinct fashion, as if the story could take
care of itself, and only required to be stated clearly as to facts. The detached
ornamental parts, on the contrary, receive a degree of careful attention not
given to the picture, seemingly with the object of making their loneliness
attractive.
The broad-humor characteristic of the [188] companion picture of medieval life, in the little
domestic scene, Fig. 65, is equally free from forced exaggeration or intentional
misproportion. Scale and anatomy, to be sure, have had little consideration
from the carver, but we readily forgive the inaccuracies in this respect, on
account of his quick wit in devising means to an end.
Before we leave this subject, look at Plate II, in which you will see a
curious use of misproportion—intentional, too, in this case—and used for quite
other than humorous purposes. This is a little ornamental figure from the tomb
of Henry IV, in Canterbury Cathedral. You will see that the body is out of all
proportion; too small for the head which surmounts it, or too big for the feet
upon which it stands. Now, what could have induced the carver to treat a dainty
little lady thus? It certainly was not that he considered it an improvement upon
nature, nor was it a joke on his part. It could only be done for some practical
reason such as this: that the little figure does part duty as a bracket, hence,
more appearance of solidity is required at the top, and less at the foot, than
true proportions would [189] admit. It is all done
so unostentatiously that one might look for hours at the figure without noticing
the license. Not that I should advise you to imitate this [190] naive way out
of a difficulty. The childlike simplicity of its treatment succeeds where
conscious effort would only end in affectation.
Fig. 66.
Fig. 67.
In Fig. 66 you will see another little figure doing duty in connection with a [191] stall
division in the Lady Chapel at Winchester Cathedral. Its smooth roundness of form is very appropriate to the position it occupies; while its polished surface
bears ample testimony that it has given no offense to the touch of the many hands which have rested upon it.
Fig. 67 shows another example of the same sort, but perched on a lower part
of the division. This one is from the cathedral at Berne, each division of the
stalls having a different figure, of which this is a type.
TABLE OF CONTENTS | INDEX OF WOOD CARVING TOPICS