[Pg 52]
THE COMPLETE GOLFER
By Harry Vardon
CHAPTER V
DRIVING—PRELIMINARIES
Advantage of a good drive—And the pleasure of it—More about the driver—Tee low—Why high tees are bad—The question of stance—Eccentricities and bad habits—Begin in good style—Measurements of the stance—The reason why—The grip of the club—My own method and its advantages—Two hands like one—Comparative tightness of the hands—Variations during the swing—Certain disadvantages of the two-V grip—Addressing the ball—Freaks of style—How they must be compensated for—Too much waggling—The point to look at—Not the top of the ball but the side of it.
It has been said
that the amateur golfers of Great Britain are in these days suffering from a "debauchery of long driving." The general sense of Mr. Travis's remark is
excellent, meaning that there is a tendency to regard a very long drive as almost everything in the playing of a hole, and to be utterly careless of
straightness and the short game so long as the ball has been hit from the tee to the full extent of the golfer's power. A long drive is not by any means
everything, and the young golfer should resist any inclination to strive for the 250-yard ball to the detriment or even the total neglect of other equally
important, though perhaps less showy, considerations in the playing of a hole. But having said so much, and conveyed the solemn warning that is necessary, I am
obliged to admit that the long driver has very full justification for himself, and that the wisely regulated ambition of the young player to be one is both
natural and laudable. The long drive, as I say, is not everything; but to play well it is as necessary to make a good drive as to hole a short putt, or nearly
so, and from the golfer who[Pg 53] does not drive well a most marvellous excellence is required in
the short game if he is to hold his own in good company, or ever be anything more than a long-handicap man. The good drive is the foundation of a good game,
and just as one and one make two, so it follows that the man who drives the longer ball has the rest of the game made easier and more certain for him. This
apart, there is no stroke in golf that gives the same amount of pleasure as does the perfect driving of the ball from the tee, none that makes the heart feel
lighter, and none that seems to bring the glow of delight into the watching eye as this one does. The man who has never stood upon the tee with a sturdy rival
near him and driven a perfect ball, the hands having followed well through and finished nicely up against the head, while the little white speck in the
distance, after skimming the earth for a time, now rises and soars upwards, clearing all obstacles, and seeming to revel in its freedom and speed until at
last it dips gracefully back to earth again—I say that the man who has not done this thing has missed one of the joys of life. I have heard the completest
sportsmen say that there are very few things in the entire world of sport that can be compared with it, and none that is superior.
So now let us get on to our drive.
First, of course, the driver must be selected, and the hints I have already
given upon the choice of clubs will serve tolerably well in this respect. Let it
only be said again that the golfer should do his utmost to avoid extremes in
length or shortness. One hears of the virtues of fishing-rod drivers, and the
next day that certain great players display a tendency to shorten their clubs.
There is nothing like the happy medium, which has proved its capability of
getting the longest balls. The length of the club must, of course, vary
according to the height of the player, for what would be a short driver for a
six-foot man would almost be a fishing-rod to the diminutive person who stands
but five feet high. Let the weight be medium also; but for reasons[Pg 54] already stated do
not let it err on the side of lightness. The shaft of the club should be of
moderate suppleness. As I have said, if it is too whippy it may be hard to
control, but if it is too stiff it leaves too much hard work to be done by the
muscles of the golfer. Practising what I preach, my own drivers are carefully
selected for this delicate medium of suppleness of shaft, and when a stick is
found that is exactly perfect it is well worth great care for ever. Also I
reiterate that the head of the club should not be too large; driving is not
thereby made any easier, and carelessness is encouraged. The face should not be
quite vertical: if it were, only the top edge and not the full face would be
seen when the stance had been taken and the club head was resting upon the tee
in its proper place. There must be just so much loft that the face can be seen
when the golfer is ready and in position for the swing. But avoid having too
much loft filed on the club as a fancied remedy for driving too low and getting
into all the bunkers. You do not fail to get the ball up because there is not
sufficient loft on the club, but because you are doing something wrong which can
easily be remedied; while, on the other hand, be very careful of the fact that,
as you add loft to the face of the driver so at the same time you are cutting
off distance and losing both power and the delightful sense of it. When the
weather is wet, it is a good plan to chalk the face of the club, as this
counteracts the tendency of the ball to skid from it.
Tee the ball low, rejecting the very prevalent but erroneous idea that you
are more certain of getting it away cleanly and well when it is poised high off
the ground. The stroke that sweeps the ball well away from the low tee is the
most natural and perfect, and it follows that the ball, properly driven from
this low tee, is the best of all. Moreover, one is not so liable to get too much
underneath the ball and make a feeble shot into the sky, which is one of the
most exasperating forms of ineffectual effort in the whole range of golf.
Another convincing argument in favour of the low tee is that[Pg 55] it preserves a
greater measure of similarity between the first shot and the second, helping to
make the latter, with the brassy, almost a repetition of the first, and
therefore simple and comparatively easy. If you make a high tee, when you come
to play your second stroke with your brassy, you will be inclined to find fault
with even the most perfect brassy lies—when the ball is so well held up by the
blades of grass that the best possible shot with this far-sending club should be
the result. If you are favoured with an ordinary brassy lie, you imagine the
ball to be in a hole, exclaim that you are badly cupped, and call out
vexatiously for an iron. This is the regular result of playing from a high tee,
whereas, when the low one is systematically adopted, the difference between the
play with the driver and with the brassy from a good lie is inconsiderable, the
brassy is used more frequently, and the results are regularly better. As I have
already suggested, one of the principles of my long game is to make the play
with the brassy as nearly similar to that with the driver as possible, and a low
tee is the first step in that direction.
There are wide variations in the stances adopted by different players, and
extremes of one sort or another are usually the result of bad habits contracted
in the early stages of initiation into the mysteries of the game. Sometimes the
ball is seen opposite the toe of the left foot; at others it is far away to the
right. Either of these players may get long balls constantly, but it is in spite
of the stance and not because of it, for they are contending against a handicap
all the time, and have unconsciously to introduce other mannerisms into their
play to counteract the evil which a bad stance inevitably brings about. It is
certain that if they had driven in the easier way from their youth upwards, they
would in their golfing prime have been getting longer balls than those with
which they are after all apparently satisfied. But I have already admitted
generally, and here again admit in a specific instance, the
dissatisfaction,[Pg
56] and even danger, that is likely to accrue from an attempt to
uproot a system of play which has been established in an individual for many
years. One can only insist upon the necessity of starting well, and plead
earnestly to any readers who may not yet be far advanced in their experience of
the game, to see that their play is based on wise and sure foundations. There is
nothing of my own discovery or invention in my stance for the drive. It is
simply that which is theoretically and scientifically correct, being calculated,
that is, to afford the greatest freedom of movement to the arms, legs, and body
in the swinging of the club, so that the strength may be exerted to the fullest
advantage at the right moment and continued in its effect upon the ball for the
longest possible period.
First, then, as to distance from the ball. The player should stand so far
away from it that when he is in position and the club face is resting against
the teed ball, just as when ready to strike it, the end of the shaft shall reach
exactly up to his left knee when the latter is ever so slightly bent. In this
position he should be able, when he has properly gripped the club, to reach the
ball comfortably and without any stretching, the arms indeed being not quite
straight out but having a slight bend at the elbows, so that when the club is
waggled in the preliminary address to the ball, plenty of play can be felt in
them. I must now invite the player who is following me in these remarks to give
his attention simultaneously to the photograph of myself, as I have taken my
stance upon the tee for an ordinary drive (Plate
VI.), with the object of getting the longest ball possible under conditions
in all respects normal; and to the small diagram in the corner of the picture
giving all the measurements necessary to a complete understanding of the
position. I may point out again that my height is 5 feet 9¼ inches, and that the
length of my driver from the heel to the end of the shaft is 42 inches. My
stature being medium, the majority of players who desire to follow my[Pg 57] suggestions will be
able to do so without any altering of the measurements given in these diagrams;
and, indeed, until any variation in height one way or the other becomes
considerable, there is no necessity to vary them. Remember that in this and all
subsequent illustrations the line marked A points to the direction in which it
is desired that the ball should travel, and that the B line over which the
player stands is at right angles to it. Those who wish at this moment to examine
the stance in the most practical manner, and to compare it with that which they
have been in the habit of playing from, need hardly be informed that at the
corners of nearly every carpet there are rectangular lines either in the pattern
or made by borders, which may be taken to represent those in the diagram, and a
penny placed at the junction will stand for the ball. It will be observed that,
for the most lucid and complete exposition of the stances, in this and all
subsequent cases, the diagrams have been turned about, so that here the player
has, as it were, his back to the reader, while in the photographs he is, of
course, facing him. But the stances are identical. The diagrams have been drawn
to scale.
It will be noticed, in the first place, that I have my toes turned well
outwards. The pivoting which is necessary, and which will be described in due
course, is done naturally and without any effort when the toes are pointed in
this manner. While it is a mistake to place the feet too near each other, there
is a common tendency to place them too far apart. When this is done, ease and
perfection of the swing are destroyed and power is wasted, whilst the whole
movement is devoid of grace. It will be seen that my left foot is a little, but
not much, in advance of the ball. My heel, indeed, is almost level with it,
being but an inch from the B line at the end of which the ball is teed. The toe,
however, is 9½ inches away from it, all measurements in this case and others
being taken from the exact centre of the point of the toe. The point of the
right toe is 19 inches distant from the B[Pg 58] line, and while this toe is 27½ inches from the
A line the other is 34 inches from it, so that the right foot is 6½ inches in
advance of the left. After giving these measurements, there is really little
more to explain about the stance, particularly as I shall show shortly how
variations from it almost certainly bring about imperfect drives. Theoretically,
the reason for the position is, I think, fairly obvious. The right foot is in
advance of the left, so that at the most critical period of the stroke there
shall be nothing to impede the follow-through, but everything to encourage it,
and so that at the finish the body itself can be thrown forward in the last
effort to continue the application of power. It would not be in a position to do
so if the left foot were in front to bar the way. The position of the ball as
between the right foot and the left is such that the club will strike it just at
the time when it is capable of doing so to the utmost advantage, being then, and
for the very minute portion of a second during which ball and club may be
supposed to remain in contact, moving in as nearly as possible a straight line
and at its maximum speed.
PLATE II. THE GRIP WITH THE
LEFT HAND
PLATE III. THE OVERLAPPING
GRIP
PLATE IV. THE OVERLAPPING
GRIP
PLATE V. THE OVERLAPPING
GRIP
Now comes the all-important consideration of the grip. This is another matter
in which the practice of golfers differs greatly, and upon which there has been
much controversy. My grip
is one of my own invention. It differs materially from
most others, and if I am asked to offer any excuse for it, I shall say that I
adopted it only after a careful trial of all the other grips of which I had ever
heard, that in theory and practice I find it admirable—more so than any
other—and that in my opinion it has contributed materially to the attainment of
such skill as I possess. The favour which I accord to my method might be viewed
with suspicion if it had been my natural or original grip, which came naturally
or accidentally to me when I first began to play as a boy, so many habits that
are bad being contracted at this stage and clinging to the player for the rest
of his life. But this was not the case, for when I[Pg 59] first began to play golf I grasped my
club in what is generally regarded as the orthodox manner, that is to say,
across the palms of both hands separately, with both thumbs right round the
shaft (on the left one, at all events), and with the joins between the thumbs
and first fingers showing like two V's over the top of the shaft. This is
usually described as the two-V grip, and it is the one which is taught by the
majority of professionals to whom the beginner appeals for first instruction in
the game. Of course it is beyond question that some players achieve very fine
results with this grip, but I abandoned it many years ago in favour of one that
I consider to be better. My contention is that this grip of mine is sounder in
theory and easier in practice, tends to make a better stroke and to secure a
straighter ball, and that players who adopt it from the beginning will stand a
much better chance of driving well at an early stage than if they went in for
the old-fashioned two-V. My grip is an overlapping, but not an interlocking one.
Modifications of it are used by many fine players, and it is coming into more
general practice as its merits are understood and appreciated. I use it for all
my strokes, and it is only when putting that I vary it in the least, and then
the change is so slight as to be scarcely noticeable. The photographs (Plates
II., III.,
IV.,
and V.)
illustrating the grip of the left hand singly, and of the two together from
different points of view, should now be closely examined.
It will be seen at once that I do not grasp the club across the palm of
either hand. The club being taken in the left hand first, the shaft passes from
the knuckle joint of the first finger across the ball of the second. The left
thumb lies straight down the shaft—that is to say, it is just to the left of the
centre of the shaft. But the following are the significant features of the grip.
The right hand is brought up so high that the palm of it covers over the left
thumb, leaving very little of the latter to be seen. The first and second
fingers of the right hand just reach round to the thumb[Pg 60] of the left, and the third finger
completes the overlapping process, so that the club is held in the grip as if it
were in a vice. The little finger of the right hand rides on the first finger of
the left. The great advantage of this grip is that both hands feel and act like
one, and if, even while sitting in his chair, a player who has never tried it
before will take a stick in his hands in the manner I have described, he must at
once be convinced that there is a great deal in what I say for it, although, of
course, if he has been accustomed to the two V's, the success of my grip cannot
be guaranteed at the first trial. It needs some time to become thoroughly happy
with it.
We must now consider the degree of tightness of the grip by either hand, for
this is an important matter. Some teachers of golf and various books of
instruction inform us that we should grasp the club firmly with the left hand
and only lightly with the right, leaving the former to do the bulk of the work
and the other merely to guide the operations. It is astonishing with what
persistency this error has been repeated, for error I truly believe it is. Ask
any really first-class player with what comparative tightness he holds the club
in his right and left hands, and I am confident that in nearly every case he
will declare that he holds it nearly if not quite as tightly with the right hand
as with the left. Personally I grip quite as firmly with the right hand as with
the other one. When the other way is adopted, the left hand being tight and the
right hand simply watching it, as it were, there is an irresistible tendency for
the latter to tighten up suddenly at some part of the upward or downward swing,
and, as surely as there is a ball on the tee, when it does so there will be
mischief. Depend upon it the instinct of activity will prevent the right hand
from going through with the swing in that indefinite state of looseness. Perhaps
a yard from the ball in the upward swing, or a yard from it when coming down,
there will be a convulsive grip of the right hand which, with an immediate
acknowledgment[Pg 61]
of guilt, will relax again. Such a happening is usually fatal; it certainly
deserves to be. Slicing, pulling, sclaffing, and the foundering of the innocent
globe—all these tragedies may at times be traced to this determination of the
right hand not to be ignored but to have its part to play in the making of the
drive. Therefore in all respects my right hand is a joint partner with the
left.
The grip with the first finger and thumb of my right hand is exceedingly
firm, and the pressure of the little finger on the knuckle of the left hand is
very decided. In the same way it is the thumb and first finger of the left hand
that have most of the gripping work to do. Again, the palm of the right hand
presses hard against the thumb of the left. In the upward swing this pressure is
gradually decreased, until when the club reaches the turning-point there is no
longer any such pressure; indeed, at this point the palm and the thumb are
barely in contact. This release is a natural one, and will or should come
naturally to the player for the purpose of allowing the head of the club to
swing well and freely back. But the grip of the thumb and first finger of the
right hand, as well as that of the little finger upon the knuckle of the first
finger of the left hand, is still as firm as at the beginning. As the club head
is swung back again towards the ball, the palm of the right hand and the thumb
of the left gradually come together again. Both the relaxing and the
re-tightening are done with the most perfect graduation, so that there shall be
no jerk to take the club off the straight line. The easing begins when the hands
are about shoulder high and the club shaft is perpendicular, because it is at
this time that the club begins to pull, and if it were not let out in the manner
explained, the result would certainly be a half shot or very little more than
that, for a full and perfect swing would be an impossibility. This relaxation of
the palm also serves to give more freedom to the wrist at the top of the swing just when that freedom is desirable.
[Pg 62]
I have the strongest faith in the soundness of the grip that I have described. When you use this grip properly, both hands are acting together and to the best advantage, while, on the other hand, no pun intended, it often happens in the two-V grip, even when practiced by the most skillful players, that in the downward swing there is a sense of the left hand doing its best to get on with it and of the right hand holding it back.
There is only one other small matter to mention in connection with the
question of grip. Some golfers imagine that if they rest the left thumb down the
shaft and let the right hand press upon it there will be a considerable danger
of breaking the thumb, so severe is the pressure when the stroke is being made.
As a matter of fact, I have quite satisfied myself that if the thumb is kept in
the same place there is not the slightest risk of anything of the kind. Also if
the thumb remains immovable, as it should, there is no possibility of the club
turning in the hands as so often happens in the case of the two-V grip when the
ground is hit rather hard, a pull or a slice being the usual consequence. I must
be excused for treating upon these matters at such length. They are often
neglected, but they are of extreme importance in laying the foundations of a
good game of golf.
In addressing the ball, take care to do so with the centre of the face of the
club, that is, at the desired point of contact. Some awkward eccentricities may
frequently be observed on the tee. A player may be seen addressing his ball from
the toe of the driver, and I have even noticed the address being made with the
head of the club quite inside the ball, while in other cases it is the heel of
the club which is applied to the object to be struck. The worthy golfers who are
responsible for these freaks of style no doubt imagine that they are doing a
wise and proper thing, and in the most effectual manner counteracting some other
irregularity of their method of play which may not be discoverable, and which is
in any case incurable. Yet nothing is more certain than that another
irregularity must be introduced into the[Pg 63] drive in order to correct the one made in the
address. To the point at which the club is addressed it will naturally return in
the course of the swing, and if it is to be guided to any other than the
original place, there must be a constant effort all through the swing to effect
this change in direction, and most likely somewhere or other there will be
sufficient jerk to spoil the drive. In the case where the ball is addressed with
the toe of the club, the player must find it necessary almost to fall on the
ball in coming down, and it is quite impossible for him to get his full distance
in such circumstances.
A waggle of the head of the club as a preliminary before commencing the swing
is sometimes necessary after the stance and grip have been taken, but every
young golfer should be warned against excess in this habit. With the stance and
grip arranged, the line of the shot in view, and a full knowledge of what is
required from the stroke, there is really very little more that needs thinking
about before the swing is taken. One short preliminary waggle will tend to make
the player feel comfortable and confident, but some golfers may be observed
trying the patience of all about them by an interminable process of waggling,
the most likely result of which is a duffed shot, since, when at last the stroke
is made, the player is in a state of semi-catalepsy, and has no clear idea of
what he is going to do or how he is going to do it.
In addressing the ball, and during the upward and downward swings until it
has been safely despatched, the sight should be kept riveted, not on the top of
the ball, as is customary, but upon the ground immediately to the right of it
(see diagram on p.
170). To the point where the gaze is fixed the head of the club will
automatically be guided. That is why you are told to keep your eye on the ball.
But you do not want to hit the top of the ball. So look to the side, where you do want to hit it.
Preface - TABLE OF CONTENTS - Driving - The Swing